TIME: November 2008
.AUTHOR: Richard Kearney
.NOTES: .
This was a De-
Ja-
Vu book for me on a couple of fronts. Firstly, many of the Humanities
professors at my college read this book years ago and it has influenced what they teach greatly (whether they know it or not). Also, many of my friends have read or partially read the book. Lastly, the idea of narrative or story being an important avenue of truth has always been popular in Christianity to some extent; (beginning with Jesus and his parables) but has become even more popular in recent history with the
coming of the 'emergent Church' and a more
arty crowd. Like De-
Ja-
Vu everything seemed familiar in this read but it was much clearer this time around.
Kearney works to outline the importance of narrative in this book by defining five main
categories of 'use'. I hesitate to use functional language because I think part of what Kearney is doing is kicking against the enlightenment shrines built around 'absolute truth', function as king, and
empirical fact. At any rate, The book covers five main elements of narrative that make it vital to our existence.
One:Plot (MYTHOS)
This element was the hardest to understand for me. Essentially, I think it is dealing with the basic form of human life and the fact that making
conscious story of it is very helpful in achieving life abundantly. Kearney points to the fact that all human life is essentially a plot line. We all have a beginning, middle and end. All of our stories are peppered with climax, conflict, emotion, characters and so on. We are all stories waiting to be read and interpreted. By
consciously seeing ourselves as such we are able to examine our plot lines, placing ourselves in the greater story and interpreting our lives in light of the history and projection that story offers. I feel sure that my brief explanation has done injustice to Kearney's complex thought but as an
amateur reader I am trying to communicate what I gathered rather than what would have been gleaned by my superiors.
As a side, I could not help but think of the implications of this understanding of life for the thoughts of a Christian. It is Evangelical speak to say that we are all written into God's story and that we are all playing our roles as assigned by God... However, I could not help but reflect on the deeper meaning offered by this book. It is true that we all have a plot; so why should the universe not have the same? Also, I can't help but think that as conscious players examining and being enriched by our autobiographical roles we are helping to write the greater script in some small way?TWO: Re-Creation (MIMESIS)
This element is the one that is always present in fiction. Kearney is careful not to use the word "imitation" because he wants to avoid 'servile
connotation'. That is to say he does not want to limit or oppress
MIMESIS with the idea that it must be empirical fact. The Re-creation of a story or event into a written, filmed, or told form is an effort to capture its essence in a way. Kearney speaks much of the use of parody of
caricature.
MIMESIS reveals important truth to us by the telling. It is self reflective like
MYTHOS but this is a bit different because it can be any story , not just our own. This is why
MIMESIS is sometimes present in the telling of History as well. The historical aspect is touchy though as there is some debate over whether History should be 'just the facts', which is impossible of course but non-the-less valued by some. There is a sizable section in the middle of the book dealing with
different Holocaust representations which is helpful in more fully understanding this element.
THREE: RELEASE (CATHARSIS)In Catharsis we are able to 'live a day in another mans shoes'. Kearney explains that this element involves both sufficient distance from events and persons as well as a type of sympathetic closeness. Most Christians will have experienced something like this in the arena of 'testimony' or perhaps in certain types of meditation involving the imaginative placing of oneself in a character of bystander in biblical stories. This element allows us to empathize with the other. I believe that it can also serve as a
therapeutic aide to those actually involved. In story, we are able to live in a situation otherwise foreign to us, we can experience the pain, fear,
distress, joy etc. of a character and empathize with them. This is not true with all accounts. Take for example the difference between an autopsy report for a murder victim and a biography about the victim who owned the body before it was dismembered. The one would hold much more empathetic weight than the other... perhaps this is why
CSI is so popular?
FOUR:WISDOM (PHRONESIS)
Number four is a bit confusing to me as was number one. To the best of my knowledge Kearney is pointing to a unique function in fiction (although it spills into non-fiction in a complex overlap). This function is its ability to respect individuality in story while still interacting with universality. So, 'wisdom' is imparted through story in a way that is universally applicable to the human condition. A type of truth (wisdom) which is not empirical fact can be communicated through imaginative narrative that in fact, cannot be told through an autopsy report, a list of the dead, or even a
purely objective view of an event.
I think this is probably why Jesus used the parable so much.FIVE: ETHICS (ETHOS)
In this bit Kearney briefly talks about narrative as conversation. He says that in all story there is a teller, a story, a listener, and a real or imaginary world. In the interplay of these elements ETHOS is worked out. By allowing us to traverse in common worlds with one an other we are able to experience the other. This interplay creates and maintains a viable arena for the telling of truth, and empathizing even with our enemy. We find common ground in the story.
The untold life is not worth living-R. Kearney- My post about Homer seems relevant here